Device comparison

Anbernic RG-552 vs. Anbernic RG-351M

Compare specs, emulation support, community reviews, ownership, and play history.

Compare

With

RG-552
RG-351M

Shown to scale from each device’s real-world dimensions.

Quick verdict

Best value
RG-351M
More portable
RG-351M
Newer model
RG-552

Main differences

  • Anbernic RG-552 has stronger listed emulation coverage.
  • Anbernic RG-351M is about $60 cheaper based on catalog pricing.
  • Anbernic RG-351M is roughly 37% smaller and 25% lighter.
  • Anbernic RG-552 runs Android 11; Anbernic RG-351M runs EmuELEC, 351ELEC, ArkOS, Batocera, Lakka, 351Droid (Lineage 18.1 / Android 11).

Anbernic

RG-552

Details
Price
$200
OS
Android 11
Released
Dec 2021
Up to
Dreamcast
Screen
5.36 inch IPS
Weight
362 grams

No reviews yet

0 collectors

Anbernic

RG-351M

Details
Price
$140
OS
EmuELEC, 351ELEC, ArkOS, Batocera, Lakka, 351Droid (Lineage 18.1 / Android 11)
Released
Jan 2021
Up to
DS
Screen
3.5 inch IPS
Weight
271 grams

No reviews yet

0 collectors

Specs

BetterWorse

SpecRG-552RG-351M
Price$200$140
OSAndroid 11EmuELEC, 351ELEC, ArkOS, Batocera, Lakka, 351Droid (Lineage 18.1 / Android 11)
Screen5.36 inch3.5 inch
Aspect ratio5:33:2
Resolution1920 x 1152320 x 480
ChipsetRockChip RK3399RockChip RK3326
CPUCortex-A72 / Cortex-A53Cortex-A35
GPUMali-T860 MP4Mali-G31 MP2
RAM4 GB LPDDR41 GB DDR3
StorageInternal 64 GB eMMC, Dual External MicroSDExternal MicroSD
Battery6400 mAh3500 mAh
Weight362 grams271 grams
Dimensions198.1 mm x 85.6 mm x 20 mm151.5 mm x 70 mm x 18 mm
Video outYesNo
Touch screenYesNo

Emulation

Excellent › Good › Playable › Limited › Unsupported

SystemRG-552RG-351M
Classic systems
Game Boy
NES
Genesis
GBA
SNES
PS1
Mid-generation systems
DS
N64
Dreamcast
PSP
Saturn
Sixth-generation systems
GameCube
Wii
PS2
Modern systems
3DS
Switch
Wii U
PS3

Emulation source notes

  • RG-552 DS: Nintendo DS: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-351M DS: Nintendo DS: Most games playable at full speed, a few games have lower frame rates but still mostly playable with frameskip This device does not have a touchscreen, so you won't be able to play DS games that rely heavily on the touchscreen
  • RG-552 3DS: Nintendo 3DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-351M 3DS: Nintendo 3DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-552 GBA: Nintendo Game Boy Advance: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-351M GBA: Nintendo Game Boy Advance: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-552 N64: Nintendo 64: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-351M N64: Nintendo 64: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
  • RG-552 NES: Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-351M NES: Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-552 PS1: Sony Playstation: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-351M PS1: Sony Playstation: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-552 PS2: Sony Playstation 2: Only the easiest to emulate games are barely playable Gameplay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcnzFvZ4lZE
  • RG-351M PS2: Sony Playstation 2: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-552 PS3: Sony Playstation 3: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-351M PS3: Sony Playstation 3: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-552 PSP: Sony Playstation Portable: Most games playable at full speed, a few games have lower frame rates but still mostly playable with frameskip God of War Chains of Olympus (at 2x resolution), running around 22-30 FPS: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/838733031716028416/911979991623929917/QQ_605bc4f347e3bebdea22415b8a13776b1637493713.mp4
  • RG-351M PSP: Sony Playstation Portable: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
  • RG-552 Wii: Nintendo Wii: Only the easiest to emulate games are barely playable
  • RG-351M Wii: Nintendo Wii: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-552 SNES: Super Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-351M SNES: Super Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-552 Wii U: Nintendo Wii U: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-351M Wii U: Nintendo Wii U: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-552 Saturn: Sega Saturn: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
  • RG-351M Saturn: Sega Saturn: Only the easiest to emulate games are barely playable
  • RG-552 Switch: Nintendo Switch: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-351M Switch: Nintendo Switch: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-552 Genesis: Sega Genesis / Mega Drive: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-351M Genesis: Sega Genesis / Mega Drive: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-552 Game Boy: Game Boy / Game Boy Color: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-351M Game Boy: Game Boy / Game Boy Color: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • RG-552 GameCube: Nintendo GameCube: Only the easiest to emulate games are barely playable
  • RG-351M GameCube: Nintendo GameCube: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • RG-552 Dreamcast: Sega Dreamcast: Most games playable at full speed, a few games have lower frame rates but still mostly playable with frameskip
  • RG-351M Dreamcast: Sega Dreamcast: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games

Frequently asked

What's the difference between the Anbernic RG-552 and the Anbernic RG-351M?
Anbernic RG-552 has stronger listed emulation coverage. Anbernic RG-351M is about $60 cheaper based on catalog pricing. Anbernic RG-351M is roughly 37% smaller and 25% lighter. Anbernic RG-552 runs Android 11; Anbernic RG-351M runs EmuELEC, 351ELEC, ArkOS, Batocera, Lakka, 351Droid (Lineage 18.1 / Android 11).
Which is cheaper, the Anbernic RG-552 or the Anbernic RG-351M?
The Anbernic RG-351M is the cheaper of the two at around $140, roughly $60 less than the Anbernic RG-552 based on catalog pricing.
Which is newer, the Anbernic RG-552 or the Anbernic RG-351M?
The Anbernic RG-552 is the newer model, released in 2021.

Compare RG-552 with