Anbernic
RG-FC520
- Price
- $13
- OS
- ❌
- Released
- Aug 2020
- Up to
- NES
- Screen
- 3.0 inch TFT
- Weight
- 200 grams
No reviews yet
0 collectors
Device comparison
Anbernic RG-FC520 vs. Anbernic RG-300
Compare specs, emulation support, community reviews, ownership, and play history.
Compare
With
Shown to scale from each device’s real-world dimensions.
Quick verdict
- Best value
- RG-FC520
- Better screen
- RG-300
- More portable
- RG-FC520
- Newer model
- RG-FC520
Main differences
- Anbernic RG-300 has stronger listed emulation coverage.
- Anbernic RG-FC520 is about $47 cheaper based on catalog pricing.
- Anbernic RG-FC520 is roughly 16% smaller and 9% lighter.
- Anbernic RG-FC520 has a 60 Hz TFT screen, versus 60 Hz IPS on Anbernic RG-300.
- Anbernic RG-FC520 runs ❌; Anbernic RG-300 runs RetroFW.
- Anbernic RG-FC520 is highlighted for NES; Anbernic RG-300 is highlighted for Game Boy, NES, Genesis.
Details
Anbernic
RG-300
- Price
- $60
- OS
- RetroFW
- Released
- Jun 2019
- Up to
- Genesis
- Screen
- 3.0 inch IPS
- Weight
- 220 grams
No reviews yet
0 collectors
Specs
BetterWorse
| Spec | RG-FC520 | RG-300 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $13 | $60 |
| OS | ❌ | RetroFW |
| Screen | 3.0 inch | 3.0 inch |
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Resolution | 320 x 240 | 320 x 480 |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel | TFT | IPS |
| Chipset | Ricoh 2A03 | Ingenic JZ4760B |
| CPU | MOS Technology 6502 | XBurst |
| GPU | Ricoh 2C02 | Vivante GC200 |
| RAM | 2 KB | 128 MB DDR2 |
| Storage | Internal Flash ROM | Internal & External MicroSD |
| Battery | 600 mAh | 1800 mAh BP-5L |
| Weight | 200 grams | 220 grams |
| Dimensions | 83 mm x 98.5 mm x 17 mm | 119 mm x 82 mm x 25 mm |
| Video out | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Hall effect sticks | No | No |
| Analog triggers | No | No |
| Touch screen | No | No |
Emulation
Excellent › Good › Playable › Limited › Unsupported
| System | RG-FC520 | RG-300 |
|---|---|---|
| Classic systems | ||
| Game Boy | ||
| NES | ||
| Genesis | ||
| GBA | ||
| SNES | ||
| PS1 | ||
| Mid-generation systems | ||
| DS | ||
| N64 | ||
| Dreamcast | ||
| PSP | ||
| Saturn | ||
| Sixth-generation systems | ||
| GameCube | ||
| Wii | ||
| PS2 | ||
| Modern systems | ||
| 3DS | ||
| Switch | ||
| Wii U | ||
| PS3 | ||
Emulation source notes
- RG-FC520 DS: Nintendo DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 DS: Nintendo DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 3DS: Nintendo 3DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 3DS: Nintendo 3DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 GBA: Nintendo Game Boy Advance: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 GBA: Nintendo Game Boy Advance: Most games playable at full speed, a few games have lower frame rates but still mostly playable with frameskip
- RG-FC520 N64: Nintendo 64: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 N64: Nintendo 64: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 NES: Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- RG-300 NES: Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- RG-FC520 PS1: Sony Playstation: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 PS1: Sony Playstation: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
- RG-FC520 PS2: Sony Playstation 2: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 PS2: Sony Playstation 2: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 PS3: Sony Playstation 3: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 PS3: Sony Playstation 3: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 PSP: Sony Playstation Portable: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 PSP: Sony Playstation Portable: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 Wii: Nintendo Wii: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 Wii: Nintendo Wii: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 SNES: Super Nintendo Entertainment System: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 SNES: Super Nintendo Entertainment System: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
- RG-FC520 Wii U: Nintendo Wii U: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 Wii U: Nintendo Wii U: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 Saturn: Sega Saturn: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 Saturn: Sega Saturn: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 Switch: Nintendo Switch: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 Switch: Nintendo Switch: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 Genesis: Sega Genesis / Mega Drive: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 Genesis: Sega Genesis / Mega Drive: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- RG-FC520 Game Boy: Nintendo Game Boy / Game Boy Color: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 Game Boy: Game Boy / Game Boy Color: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- RG-FC520 GameCube: Nintendo GameCube: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 GameCube: Nintendo GameCube: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-FC520 Dreamcast: Sega Dreamcast: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- RG-300 Dreamcast: Sega Dreamcast: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
Frequently asked
- What's the difference between the Anbernic RG-FC520 and the Anbernic RG-300?
- Anbernic RG-300 has stronger listed emulation coverage. Anbernic RG-FC520 is about $47 cheaper based on catalog pricing. Anbernic RG-FC520 is roughly 16% smaller and 9% lighter. Anbernic RG-FC520 has a 60 Hz TFT screen, versus 60 Hz IPS on Anbernic RG-300. Anbernic RG-FC520 runs ❌; Anbernic RG-300 runs RetroFW. Anbernic RG-FC520 is highlighted for NES; Anbernic RG-300 is highlighted for Game Boy, NES, Genesis.
- Which is cheaper, the Anbernic RG-FC520 or the Anbernic RG-300?
- The Anbernic RG-FC520 is the cheaper of the two at around $13, roughly $47 less than the Anbernic RG-300 based on catalog pricing.
- Which is newer, the Anbernic RG-FC520 or the Anbernic RG-300?
- The Anbernic RG-FC520 is the newer model, released in 2020.
