ClockworkPi
DevTerm
- Price
- $219
- OS
- Clockwork OS / Linux
- Released
- Aug 2021
- Up to
- PS1
- Screen
- 6.8 inch IPS
- Weight
- Unknown
No reviews yet
0 collectors
Device comparison
ClockworkPi DevTerm vs. Snail MOQI i7
Compare specs, emulation support, community reviews, ownership, and play history.
Compare
With
Shown to scale from each device’s real-world dimensions.
Quick verdict
- Best value
- DevTerm
- More portable
- MOQI i7
- Newer model
- DevTerm
Main differences
- ClockworkPi DevTerm has similar emulation coverage to Snail MOQI i7.
- ClockworkPi DevTerm is about $66 cheaper based on catalog pricing.
- Snail MOQI i7 is roughly 32% smaller.
- ClockworkPi DevTerm runs Clockwork OS / Linux; Snail MOQI i7 runs Android 7.1.
Details
Snail
MOQI i7
- Price
- $285
- OS
- Android 7.1
- Released
- Jan 2017
- Up to
- Dreamcast
- Screen
- 6.0 inch IPS
- Weight
- 330 grams
No reviews yet
0 collectors
Specs
BetterWorse
| Spec | DevTerm | MOQI i7 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $219 | $285 |
| OS | Clockwork OS / Linux | Android 7.1 |
| Screen | 6.8 inch | 6.0 inch |
| Aspect ratio | 8:3 | 16:9 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel | IPS | IPS |
| Chipset | User chosen core | MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X |
| CPU | Core dependent | Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 |
| GPU | Core dependent | Mali-T880 MP4 |
| RAM | Core dependent | 4 GB |
| Storage | External MicroSD | Internal 64 GB |
| Battery | 18650 x2 | 5800 mAh |
| Weight | Unknown | 330 grams |
| Dimensions | 195 mm x 150 mm x 30 mm | 207 mm x 96 mm x 15 mm |
| Video out | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Hall effect sticks | No | No |
| Analog triggers | No | No |
| Touch screen | No | Yes |
Emulation
Excellent › Good › Playable › Limited › Unsupported
| System | DevTerm | MOQI i7 |
|---|---|---|
| Classic systems | ||
| Game Boy | ||
| NES | ||
| Genesis | ||
| GBA | ||
| SNES | ||
| PS1 | ||
| Mid-generation systems | ||
| DS | ||
| N64 | ||
| Dreamcast | ||
| PSP | ||
| Saturn | ||
| Sixth-generation systems | ||
| GameCube | ||
| Wii | ||
| PS2 | ||
| Modern systems | ||
| 3DS | ||
| Switch | ||
| Wii U | ||
| PS3 | ||
Emulation source notes
- DevTerm DS: Nintendo DS: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games This device does not have a touchscreen, so you won't be able to play DS games that rely heavily on the touchscreen
- MOQI i7 DS: Nintendo DS: Most games playable at full speed, a few games have lower frame rates but still mostly playable with frameskip
- DevTerm 3DS: Nintendo 3DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- MOQI i7 3DS: Nintendo 3DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- DevTerm GBA: Nintendo Game Boy Advance: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- MOQI i7 GBA: Nintendo Game Boy Advance: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- DevTerm N64: Nintendo 64: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
- MOQI i7 N64: Nintendo 64: Most games playable at full speed, a few games have lower frame rates but still mostly playable with frameskip
- DevTerm NES: Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- MOQI i7 NES: Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- DevTerm PS1: Sony Playstation: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- MOQI i7 PS1: Sony Playstation: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- DevTerm PS2: Sony Playstation 2: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- MOQI i7 PS2: Sony Playstation 2: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- DevTerm PS3: Sony Playstation 3: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- MOQI i7 PS3: Sony Playstation 3: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- DevTerm PSP: Sony Playstation Portable: Only the easiest to emulate games are barely playable
- MOQI i7 PSP: Sony Playstation Portable: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
- DevTerm Wii: Nintendo Wii: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- MOQI i7 Wii: Nintendo Wii: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- DevTerm SNES: Super Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- MOQI i7 SNES: Super Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- DevTerm Wii U: Nintendo Wii U: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- MOQI i7 Wii U: Nintendo Wii U: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- DevTerm Saturn: Sega Saturn: Only the easiest to emulate games are barely playable
- MOQI i7 Saturn: Sega Saturn: Only the easiest to emulate games are barely playable
- DevTerm Switch: Nintendo Switch: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- MOQI i7 Switch: Nintendo Switch: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- DevTerm Genesis: Sega Genesis / Mega Drive: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- MOQI i7 Genesis: Sega Genesis / Mega Drive: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- DevTerm Game Boy: Game Boy / Game Boy Color: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- MOQI i7 Game Boy: Game Boy / Game Boy Color: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
- DevTerm GameCube: Nintendo GameCube: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
- MOQI i7 GameCube: Nintendo GameCube: Only the easiest to emulate games are barely playable
- DevTerm Dreamcast: Sega Dreamcast: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
- MOQI i7 Dreamcast: Sega Dreamcast: Most games playable at full speed, a few games have lower frame rates but still mostly playable with frameskip
Frequently asked
- What's the difference between the ClockworkPi DevTerm and the Snail MOQI i7?
- ClockworkPi DevTerm has similar emulation coverage to Snail MOQI i7. ClockworkPi DevTerm is about $66 cheaper based on catalog pricing. Snail MOQI i7 is roughly 32% smaller. ClockworkPi DevTerm runs Clockwork OS / Linux; Snail MOQI i7 runs Android 7.1.
- Which is cheaper, the ClockworkPi DevTerm or the Snail MOQI i7?
- The ClockworkPi DevTerm is the cheaper of the two at around $219, roughly $66 less than the Snail MOQI i7 based on catalog pricing.
- Which is newer, the ClockworkPi DevTerm or the Snail MOQI i7?
- The ClockworkPi DevTerm is the newer model, released in 2021.
