Device comparison

GamePark Holdings GP2X F-200 vs. Ozone Pocket Battlefield 2

Compare specs, emulation support, community reviews, ownership, and play history.

Compare

With

GP2X F-200
Pocket Battlefield 2

Not shown to scale. Real-world dimensions are missing for one or both devices.

Quick verdict

Better screen
GP2X F-200
More portable
GP2X F-200
Newer model
GP2X F-200

Main differences

  • GamePark Holdings GP2X F-200 is about 37% lighter.
  • GamePark Holdings GP2X F-200 runs GNU/Linux based; Ozone Pocket Battlefield 2 runs Linux.

GamePark Holdings

GP2X F-200

Details
Price
Unknown
OS
GNU/Linux based
Released
Jan 2007
Up to
Genesis
Screen
3.5 inch TFT
Weight
161 grams

No reviews yet

0 collectors

Ozone

Pocket Battlefield 2

Details
Price
Unknown
OS
Linux
Released
Unknown
Up to
Unknown
Screen
Unknown
Weight
257 grams

No reviews yet

0 collectors

Specs

BetterWorse

SpecGP2X F-200Pocket Battlefield 2
OSGNU/Linux basedLinux
Screen3.5 inchUnknown
Aspect ratio4:3Unknown
Resolution320 x 240Unknown
Refresh rate60 HzUnknown
PanelTFTUnknown
ChipsetMagicEyes MP2520FUnknown
CPUARM920T & ARM940TUnknown
GPU"2D Graphic Processor"Unknown
RAM64 MB SDRAMUnknown
StorageInternal 64 MB NAND Flash & External SDUnknown
BatteryAA x2Unknown
Weight161 grams257 grams
Dimensions143.6 mm x 82.9 mm x 34 mmUnknown
Touch screenYesNo

Emulation

Excellent › Good › Playable › Limited › Unsupported

SystemGP2X F-200Pocket Battlefield 2
Classic systems
Game BoyUnknown
NESUnknown
GenesisUnknown
GBAUnknown
SNESUnknown
PS1Unknown
Mid-generation systems
DSUnknown
N64Unknown
DreamcastUnknown
PSPUnknown
SaturnUnknown
Sixth-generation systems
GameCubeUnknown
WiiUnknown
PS2Unknown
Modern systems
3DSUnknown
SwitchUnknown
Wii UUnknown
PS3Unknown

Emulation source notes

  • GP2X F-200 DS: Nintendo DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 3DS: Nintendo 3DS: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 GBA: Nintendo Game Boy Advance: Most games playable at full speed, a few games have lower frame rates but still mostly playable with frameskip
  • GP2X F-200 N64: Nintendo 64: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 NES: Nintendo Entertainment System: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • GP2X F-200 PS1: Sony Playstation: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
  • GP2X F-200 PS2: Sony Playstation 2: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 PS3: Sony Playstation 3: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 PSP: Sony Playstation Portable: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 Wii: Nintendo Wii: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 SNES: Super Nintendo Entertainment System: Most games playable but mostly with frameskip, struggles with harder to emulate games
  • GP2X F-200 Wii U: Nintendo Wii U: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 Saturn: Sega Saturn: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 Switch: Nintendo Switch: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 Genesis: Sega Genesis / Mega Drive: Most games playable at full speed, a few games have lower frame rates but still mostly playable with frameskip
  • GP2X F-200 Game Boy: Game Boy / Game Boy Color: Almost all games playable at full speed without frameskip
  • GP2X F-200 GameCube: Nintendo GameCube: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow
  • GP2X F-200 Dreamcast: Sega Dreamcast: Either cannot run any games at all or games are unplayably slow

Frequently asked

What's the difference between the GamePark Holdings GP2X F-200 and the Ozone Pocket Battlefield 2?
GamePark Holdings GP2X F-200 is about 37% lighter. GamePark Holdings GP2X F-200 runs GNU/Linux based; Ozone Pocket Battlefield 2 runs Linux.

Compare GP2X F-200 with