Ozone Pocket Battlefield 2 vs. SJGAM M20

Specs, emulation, community reviews, ownership and play history, side by side.

Compare

With

Not shown to scale. Real-world dimensions are missing for one or both devices.

Quick verdict

Better screen
M20
More portable
Pocket Battlefield 2
Newer model
M20

Main differences

  • Ozone Pocket Battlefield 2 is about 27% lighter.

Ozone

Pocket Battlefield 2

Details
Price
Unknown
OS
Linux
Released
Unknown
Up to
Unknown
Screen
Unknown
Weight
257 grams

We’re not tracking prices for this one yet.

No reviews yet

SJGAM

M20

Details
Price
Unknown
OS
Linux
Released
Jan 2025
Up to
Unknown
Screen
7 IPS
Weight
350 grams

We’re not tracking prices for this one yet.

No reviews yet

Specs

BetterWorse

SpecPocket Battlefield 2M20
ScreenUnknown7
Aspect ratioUnknown128:75
ResolutionUnknown1024 x 600
PanelUnknownIPS
ChipsetUnknownRockchip RK3566
CPUUnknownCortex-A55
GPUUnknownMali-G52 2EE
RAMUnknown1 GB
StorageUnknown64 GB/128 GB microSD card
BatteryUnknown4000 mAh
Weight257 grams350 grams
DimensionsUnknown242 × 105 × 30 mm

Frequently asked

What's the difference between the Ozone Pocket Battlefield 2 and the SJGAM M20?
Ozone Pocket Battlefield 2 is about 27% lighter.

Compare Pocket Battlefield 2 with

JinXing DigitalJXD S5300Specs
JinXing DigitalJXD S5100Specs
JinXing DigitalJXD V5200Specs
HardKernelODROID SSpecs