Device comparison

Ozone Pocket Battlefield vs. JinXing Digital JXD S5100

Compare specs, emulation support, community reviews, ownership, and play history.

Compare

With

JXD S5100

Not shown to scale. Real-world dimensions are missing for one or both devices.

Quick verdict

Better screen
Pocket Battlefield
Newer model
JXD S5100

Main differences

  • JinXing Digital JXD S5100 has a Capacitive touchscreen screen, versus 60 Hz IPS on Ozone Pocket Battlefield.
  • JinXing Digital JXD S5100 runs Android; Ozone Pocket Battlefield runs Linux.

Ozone

Pocket Battlefield

Details
Price
Unknown
OS
Linux
Released
Unknown
Up to
PS1
Screen
3.5 inch IPS
Weight
297 grams

No reviews yet

0 collectors

JinXing Digital

JXD S5100

Details
Price
Unknown
OS
Android
Released
Aug 2012
Up to
Unknown
Screen
5 Capacitive touchscreen
Weight
Unknown

No reviews yet

0 collectors

Specs

BetterWorse

SpecPocket BattlefieldJXD S5100
OSLinuxAndroid
Screen3.5 inch5
Aspect ratio4:3Unknown
Resolution320x240800x480
Refresh rate60 HzUnknown
PanelIPSCapacitive touchscreen
ChipsetIngenic X1830Amlogic AML8726-M3
CPUXBurstARM Cortex-A9
RAM128 MB512 MB
StorageUnknown4 GB
Battery2300 mAhUnknown
Weight297 gramsUnknown
Video outNoYes
Touch screenNoYes

Frequently asked

What's the difference between the Ozone Pocket Battlefield and the JinXing Digital JXD S5100?
JinXing Digital JXD S5100 has a Capacitive touchscreen screen, versus 60 Hz IPS on Ozone Pocket Battlefield. JinXing Digital JXD S5100 runs Android; Ozone Pocket Battlefield runs Linux.

Compare Pocket Battlefield with