Subor, Coolbaby
RetroMini RS-90
- Price
- $30
- OS
- OpenDingux
- Released
- Jan 2017
- Up to
- GBA
- Screen
- 2.0 inch TFT
- Weight
- 103 grams
No reviews yet
0 collectors
Device comparison
Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 vs. PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16
Compare specs, emulation support, community reviews, ownership, and play history.
Compare
With
Shown to scale from each device’s real-world dimensions.
Quick verdict
- Best value
- RetroMini RS-90
- More portable
- RetroMini RS-90
- Newer model
- PowKiddy X16
Main differences
- PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16 has similar emulation coverage to Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90.
- Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 is about $15 cheaper based on catalog pricing.
- Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 is roughly 73% smaller and 64% lighter.
- PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16 runs µC/OS-II; Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 runs OpenDingux.
- PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16 is highlighted for NES, SNES; Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 is highlighted for NES, SNES, Game Boy.
Details
PowKiddy, Coolbaby
PowKiddy X16
- Price
- $45
- OS
- µC/OS-II
- Released
- Jan 2018
- Up to
- GBA
- Screen
- 7.0 inch TFT
- Weight
- 286 grams
No reviews yet
0 collectors
Specs
BetterWorse
| Spec | RetroMini RS-90 | PowKiddy X16 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $30 | $45 |
| OS | OpenDingux | µC/OS-II |
| Screen | 2.0 inch | 7.0 inch |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 5:3 |
| Resolution | 240 x 160 | 800 x 480 |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| Chipset | Ingenic JZ4725B | Actions ATJ2279B |
| CPU | XBurst | Actions ATJ2279B |
| GPU | ❌ | "Built in GPU" |
| RAM | 32 MB DDR2 | 512 MB DDR2 |
| Storage | External MicroSD | Internal 4/8/16 GB & External MicroSD |
| Battery | 1020 mAh BL-5C | 1800 mAh |
| Weight | 103 grams | 286 grams |
| Dimensions | 105 mm x 70 mm x 22 mm | 240 mm x 112 mm x 15mm |
| Video out | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Hall effect sticks | No | No |
| Analog triggers | No | No |
| Touch screen | No | No |
Emulation
Excellent › Good › Playable › Limited › Unsupported
| System | RetroMini RS-90 | PowKiddy X16 |
|---|---|---|
| Classic systems | ||
| Game Boy | Excellent | Good |
| NES | Excellent | Excellent |
| Genesis | Unsupported | Playable |
| GBA | Good | Good |
| SNES | Excellent | Excellent |
| PS1 | Unsupported | Limited |
| Mid-generation systems | ||
| DS | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| N64 | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| Dreamcast | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| PSP | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| Saturn | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| Sixth-generation systems | ||
| GameCube | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| Wii | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| PS2 | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| Modern systems | ||
| 3DS | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| Switch | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| Wii U | Unsupported | Unsupported |
| PS3 | Unsupported | Unsupported |
Frequently asked
- What's the difference between the Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 and the PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16?
- PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16 has similar emulation coverage to Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90. Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 is about $15 cheaper based on catalog pricing. Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 is roughly 73% smaller and 64% lighter. PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16 runs µC/OS-II; Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 runs OpenDingux. PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16 is highlighted for NES, SNES; Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 is highlighted for NES, SNES, Game Boy.
- Which is cheaper, the Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 or the PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16?
- The Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 is the cheaper of the two at around $30, roughly $15 less than the PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16 based on catalog pricing.
- Which is newer, the Subor, Coolbaby RetroMini RS-90 or the PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16?
- The PowKiddy, Coolbaby PowKiddy X16 is the newer model, released in 2018.
